Ex parte
Legal decision or proceeding during which not all parties to the dispute are present
In law, ex parte () is a Latin term meaning literally "from/out of the party/faction of" (name of party/faction, often omitted), thus signifying "on behalf of (name)". In common law jurisdictions, an ex parte decision is one decided by a judge without requiring all of the parties to the dispute to be present.
Nº Q142937 ★
Common · Knowledge
Ex parte
Legal decision or proceeding during which not all parties to the dispute are present
In law, ex parte () is a Latin term meaning literally "from/out of the party/faction of" (name of party/faction, often omitted), thus signifying "on behalf of (name)". In common law jurisdictions, an ex parte decision is one decided by a judge without requiring all of the parties to the dispute to be present.
Last price
—
Floor price
—
7-day median
—
30-day sales
0
30-day range
—
In circulation
0
Price history
median
low – high
sales
No sales in this period
Show table
| Date | median | Low | High | sales |
|---|
Sales history
- Last sale
- —
- 30-day average
- —
- 30-day low
- —
- 30-day high
- —
- Sales 7d
- 0
- Sales 30d
- 0
No sales yet.
Anonymous sales: no buyer or seller shown. Figures count player-to-player sales only.
From Wikipedia
In law, ex parte () is a Latin term meaning literally "from/out of the party/faction of" (name of party/faction, often omitted), thus signifying "on behalf of (name)". In common law jurisdictions, an ex parte decision is one decided by a judge without requiring all of the parties to the dispute to be present. Thus, in English law and its derivatives, namely Australian, New Zealand, Canadian, South African, Indian, and U.S. legal doctrines, ex parte means a legal proceeding brought by one party in the absence of and without representation of or notification to the other party. In civil law countries, this would be called an inaudita (altera) parte proceeding, whereas ex parte simply refers to proceedings (or aspects of proceedings, such as expert testimony entered into evidence) submitted by or decided at the request of one of the parties, without implying the absence of other parties. The term is also used more loosely to refer to improper unilateral contacts with a court, arbitrator, or represented party without notice to the other party or counsel for that party. The phrase was common in the titles of habeas corpus and judicial review cases until the end of the twentieth century, because those cases were originally brought by the Crown on behalf of the claimant. In Commonwealth common law jurisdictions, the title typically appeared as R v (Defendant), ex parte (Claimant); in the US, this was shortened to Ex parte (Claimant). A proceeding in an executive agency to establish a right, such as patent prosecution, can also be ex parte.
Text: Wikipédia, CC BY-SA 4.0. ·
Related cards
Sub judice
Matter that is under legal trial, or judgement
Nº Q1780038 ★★
Res judicata
Claim preclusion in law
Nº Q1062245 ★★
Prejudice (legal term)
Level of finality of an action or decision, e.g. legal judgement or dismissal from a job
Nº Q109701697 ★★★
Ex officio member
Member of a body who is part of it by virtue of holding another office
Nº Q144552 ★★
Dissolution (law)
Legal event that terminates a legal entity, as of a company, marriage, partnership, or adoption
Nº Q5282797 ★★
Ex post facto law
Law that retroactively changes the legal consequences or status of actions that were committed, or relationships that existed, before the enactment of the law
Nº Q328293 ★★★